The Law in India Regarding Getting an Arms Licence
Auto Beauty Business Culture Dieting DIY Events Fashion Finance Food Freelancing Gardening Health Hobbies Home Internet Jobs Law Local Media Men's Health Mobile Nutrition Parenting Pets Pregnancy Products Psychology Real Estate Relationships Science Seniors Sports Technology Travel Wellness Women's Health

The Law in India Regarding Getting an Arms Licence

The Indian Arms act of 1959 is a far reaching act and limits ownership of guns and weapons for all citizens of India. Failure to obtain an arms licence and keeping an unlicensed weapon is a cognizable offence and the police have the power to arrest any citizen having an unlicensed gun. Owning an AK-47 or similar weapon can attract a jail term of 10 years rigorous imprisonment. the Indian arms act of 1959 has been amended a number of times and made more stringent.

India is one of the countries that restricts its citizens from owning arms. All citizens of India who wish to own a gun must have a license for it, which is issued by the District Magistrate  of the place where the applicant resides. The nodal  act that controls issue of arms licences in India is the Indian Arms Act 1959, as amended  by subsequent acts of parliament.

The Indian Arms act  clearly lays down who can own weapons and the procedure to be followed to own one. The act also differentiates between weapons and bores used by the military and police and the general public.  The bores of the guns and pistols used by the army and police  are referred to as service pattern bores and civilians by corollary can only own weapons that are termed non-service pattern or bores. It follows that weapons with bores of .38 or .45 which are used by the Indian police and army cannot be owned by Indian civilian citizens. 

The arms act of 1959 has further been amended and the following sets of weapons cannot be licenced for Indian citizens

a) All automatic rifles and guns. Thus no Indian citizen can own a rifle like AK-47 or 56.

b) All pistols and revolvers that are self ejecting. This is an important provision which has been added later to the arms act. Thus pistols of the automatic variety that are self ejecting  like 9mm automatic pistol cannot be owned or licenced for any Indian citizen.

The Indian Arms act of 1959 is a far reaching act and limits ownership of guns and weapons for all citizens of India. Failure to obtain an arms licence and keeping an unlicensed weapon is a cognizable offence and the police have the power to arrest any citizen having an unlicensed gun. Owning an AK-47 or similar weapon can attract a jail term of 10 years rigorous imprisonment.

As per the arms act of 1959, there are only 3 reasons specified that allow a citizen to own a gun. they are 

a) For self protection

b) For hunting

c) For sports and shooting competitions.

The onus to  prove the above is valid is on the  applicant. He has to satisfy the district magistrate  (DM) on all the above counts. The DM has discretionary powers that  allow him to refuse a licence  for any reason he deems fit.

The Indian arms act 1959 has a special status for commissioned officers of the Indian armed forces. Any officer holding the Presidents commission is allowed to keep one weapon without a licence, provided it is approved by his commanding officer. This is a relic from the days of the Raj, when military officers had special privileges. This privilege is applicable only to serving officers and on retirement an officer must obtain a licence from the DM

Consumer advisory: For those requesting information, please find our statement regarding our ongoing litigation against Mark Mazza, Patrick Williams, and PromoCodeWatch, LLC.
Need an answer?
Get insightful answers from community-recommended
experts
in Statutory Law on Knoji.
Would you recommend this author as an expert in Statutory Law?
You have 0 recommendations remaining to grant today.
Comments (1)

IN INDIA WE DONT NEED AK 47 OR 56 TO KILL PEOPLE WE NEED ONLY A FLAG

ARTICLE DETAILS
RELATED ARTICLES
RELATED CATEGORIES
ARTICLE KEYWORDS